Executed

Governance Delegation to Active Community Members to Secure Quorum


ID 249068...9530

ID 249068...9530

Proposed on: Feb 16th, 2026

Proposed on: Feb 16th, 2026

Votes

Actions

Type

Address

Details

Custom

0xaC27...6187

approve(..)

Custom

Account

0xaC27...6187

Method

approve(..)

Custom

0x72f4...af88

delegate(..)

Custom

Account

0x72f4...af88

Method

delegate(..)

Custom

0x72f4...af88

delegate(..)

Custom

Account

0x72f4...af88

Method

delegate(..)

Custom

0x72f4...af88

delegate(..)

Custom

Account

0x72f4...af88

Method

delegate(..)

Custom

0x72f4...af88

delegate(..)

Custom

Account

0x72f4...af88

Method

delegate(..)

Custom

0x72f4...af88

delegate(..)

Custom

Account

0x72f4...af88

Method

delegate(..)

Custom

0x72f4...af88

delegate(..)

Custom

Account

0x72f4...af88

Method

delegate(..)

Custom

0x72f4...af88

delegate(..)

Custom

Account

0x72f4...af88

Method

delegate(..)

Proposal


Summary

This proposal delegates 2,000,000 UP from the Unlock DAO's treasury as added community voting power to a cohort of seven consistently active voters selected via an onchain governance leaderboard (https://auburn-hide-65473633.figma.site/). The goal is to reliably reach quorum while broadening participation beyond stewards and keeping delegations subject to periodic review as participation patterns evolve.


Background

The Unlock DAO currently requires 3,000,000 UP in votes to reach quorum on onchain proposals. Due to a hacked wallet belonging to one of our former main holders and limited active governance among whale addresses in the community, we have recently been unable to meet quorum, even when there is clear support for proposals.

To compensate, the Unlock DAO Stewards have suggested relying once on the DAO multisig, casting a large "Abstain" or in favor vote from treasury-held UP to push this specific proposal over the quorum threshold. Since this is an emergency measure, as it is operationally fragile and consolidates effective power in a single address, we suggest delegating 2,000,000 UP to consistently active governance participants across the community. During recent DAO Calls and an open forum discussion, community members aligned on the following procedure to move forward with the DAO-powered delegation toward active governance participants.


Methodology: How Delegates Were Selected

To design a fair and transparent delegation, Stella built a Governance Leaderboard using onchain voting data from the last 10 Unlock DAO proposals on Tally via the Tally API. The selection process followed these steps:

  • Data Window
    We looked at the last 10 onchain proposals for Unlock DAO and pulled all addresses that voted on at least one of them.
  • Metrics per Address
    Number of proposals voted out of 10.
    Participation rate (proposals voted / 10, expressed as a percentage).
    First and last vote timestamps to confirm recent, not purely historical, activity.
  • Filtering and Ranking
    We focused on addresses that showed repeated voting across the 10-proposal window rather than one-off participation.
    We then ranked addresses by participation rate and selected the top seven voters as potential delegates.
  • Identity and Role Checks
    Where possible, we resolved ENS names and cross-referenced Tally profiles to confirm that these addresses belong to known stewards or active community participants who regularly join calls, contribute, and engage in discussions.

This process intentionally includes both stewards and non-steward community members, directly addressing the concern that delegation should not concentrate voting power exclusively among stewards.


Proposed Delegations

Using the leaderboard, we allocate 2,000,000 UP in delegated voting power to each address in proportion to its participation rate across the last 10 proposals. Addresses with higher historical participation receive more delegated UP, aligning voting power with demonstrated engagement. Please review the Google Sheet here:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1XP0gBMCpDOmrxsvuwMjd_cM3aCyK6XZEc9uTkKKGoKA/edit?usp=sharing

From the DAO treasury contract

DelegateAddressAmount (UP)
Andreu0x9dED35Aef86F3c826Ff8fe9240f9e7a9Fb2094e5400,000
Ceci0x38B826a4426A0D4d9b4377AC57C9Af0308281c5D320,000
Money0x34c2871C3D539C473E40a09158BDff522202E2d5320,000
Danny0xCA7632327567796e51920F6b16373e92c7823854320,000
Gozman0x79f16606e9a64eDb8bA09c55eE1375bDa883c032280,000
Stella0xD2BC5cb641aE6f7A880c3dD5Aee0450b5210BE23200,000
Trigs0x87ece9936Ad2254D03af83958fE3b202dC79793f160,000

Total delegated: 2,000,000 UP


Governance Guarantees and Ongoing Review

To keep this aligned with decentralization and community legitimacy, and to clarify assumptions or doubts:

  1. Ownership of the 2,000,000 UP remains under the DAO's control. These tokens will only be delegated and used by delegates to vote; nothing else.
  2. The idea is for us to reach quorum for this proposal. Stewards will be using the UP currently active in the DAOs Multisig to vote once in favor of this proposal to resolve the quorum issue, after which the UP will be transferred to the ICHI vault as originally intended. (We will verify if "Abstain" voting will add to the quorum. If that is indeed the case, the Stewards will vote "Abstain," if not, we are forced to vote in favor.)
  3. This delegation is neither strictly temporary nor expiring on a fixed date; instead, it will be up to the DAO to review the delegation after, for example, the next 10 proposals, using the Leaderboard and adjusting their previous decision if necessary.

We expect the listed delegates to take their responsibilities seriously and participate in every onchain vote, always considering the discussions held in our Discord forum and DAO calls. This structure creates a living delegation framework: delegations persist by default but should evolve with real participation data rather than remaining static.

Discord forum link: https://discord.com/channels/462280183425138719/1470866517943128107

Live Governance Leaderboard: https://auburn-hide-65473633.figma.site/

Proportional allocation: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1XP0gBMCpDOmrxsvuwMjd_cM3aCyK6XZEc9uTkKKGoKA/edit?usp=sharing

Votes
Status