This DAO is archived. Data may be stale and governance actions are disabled. Want to reactivate this DAO? Contact support.
DRS is paused and scores are frozen to preserve previous work and community resources during this period of limited voting while we define our future governance path.
blockful – Delegate Profile
Delegate Name: @blockful Delegate Address: gov.blockful.eth (0x1f3d3a7a9c548be39539b39d7400302753e20591) Email: forum@blockful.io Website: blockful.io | anticapture.com
blockful is a company focused on governance security, creators of anticapture — a governance security dashboard and framework that:
- Acts as an independent risk assessor for DAOs.
- Makes DAO security visible, measurable, and accountable.
- Identifies attack vectors before they materialize.
- Encourages DAOs to take action before risks escalate.
We aim to help make Ethereum more legible and secure, without compromising credible neutrality.
How we act in governance
We stand for more efficient, equal, agile and creative governance.
We know how difficult it is for DAOs to bring in more people to participate in their votes and for everyone who is already there to coordinate to improve the organization.
Here’s a brief overview of our work:
- A research on ENS governance, where Blockful identified and addressed a potential governance risk within the ENS DAO
- A research focused on Compound governance
- Lessons from Arbitrum DAO: The Architecture of Governance
We help the DAO’s decision-making process by backing it up with data and research. In this way, the organization will be able to vote on better proposals and build a more efficient and sustainable ecosystem.
You can find Obol's risk assessment here: Obol | Anticapture
A Security-Oriented Approach
blockful is constantly working to make DAO governance more secure.
We’ve seen a number of attacks on decentralized organizations caused by flaws in DAO structures.
At first glance, these may seem like minor concerns — such as low delegate participation — but they can lead to severe consequences: treasury drain, protocol vulnerabilities, or even the forced dissolution of the organization.
Our north star in governance is always DAO security. Not just profitability or financial efficiency — but continuously asking: Is this a new risk vector for the DAO?
With the answers, we can not only vote more responsibly but also contribute to the development of safer, more resilient governance across the ecosystem.
Why We Want to Contribute as a Delegate in Obol
As a team focused on identifying risks before they escalate, we see Obol as a critical infrastructure layer where proactive, data-informed oversight can materially improve the safety of distributed validator technology. By contributing as a delegate, we aim to help Obol evolve with strong security standards, transparent governance, and informed decision-making, ensuring it remains robust and aligned with the long-term health of the wider Ethereum ecosystem.
Languages we speak and write:
- Portuguese
- Spanish
- English
- French
- Russian
| Proposal | Votes for | Votes against | Voted? |
|---|---|---|---|
Executed Nov 6th, 2025 | 10.25M | 4.51 | Not a member |
1.58K | 3.78M | Not a member | |
Executed Jul 4th, 2025 | 4.27M | 5.69 | Not a member |
Quorum not reached Jul 3rd, 2025 | 441.48K | 4.98M | Not a member |
Executed May 22nd, 2025 | 3.32M | 1.86M | Not a member |
| Proposal | Ballot |
|---|---|
Not a member | |
Quorum not reached | Not a member |
Not a member | |
Quorum not reached | Not a member |
Not a member |
