ENS name: irreverent.eth

My reasons for wanting to be a delegate: For a project to succeed, support from its community is key. In an ideal world, everyone would self-delegate and vote in accordance to their own views for every proposed constitution, but this often isn’t the case. The reason that I want to be a delegate is to keep those who for whatever reason may not self-delegate informed and in the loop so that ultimately their votes really do represent their own views (or they revert to self-delegation or find someone else).

My view on each section of the proposed ENS Constitution

1. Name ownership shall not be infringed: Agree, as stated in the proposal, for fairness.

2. Fees are primarily an incentive mechanism: Disagree. I believe that the fee’s only purpose is to provide enough revenue to the DAO to fund ongoing development and improvement of ENS. I also believe that a fee high enough for people to prevent speculative registrations will make ENS inaccessible for some others.

3. Income funds ENS and other public goods: Disagree. ENS governance should only use the funds to support projects that will further the development and improvements of the ENS system.

4. ENS Integrates with the global namespace: Agree.

My web3 qualifications / skills:
I am currently working on a multichain + multiwallet tool as a dev lead.