Name: @lastpiece.nft (individual, twitter)
ENS: standpoint.eth
Tally profile: Tally | standpoint.eth

What area are you most interested in contributing to?

• Public Goos Funding
• Supporting infrastructure

Stance on overall goals for the DAO:

• Promoting community engagement and delegate participation (community calls, town halls, community-led initiatives, rewards programs, engagement incentivization)
• Promoting decentralization and democratization of the ecosystem (e.g. inclusion of diverse voices)
• Increasing and retaining liquidity (incentives, partnerships, etc.)
• Supporting the development and growth of the ecosystem (provide funding to support the development of new projects and initiatives, hackathons, grant programs, etc.)
• Supporting public goods (education programs, research and development, public infrastructure, etc.)

Sample Voting Issue 1:
I would vote against the proposal because it gives too much power and control in the hand of one entity, defeating the purpose of governance decentralization.
I would amend the proposal in such a way that the allocation remains balances enough to avoid centralization.

Sample Voting Issue 2:
That’s a difficult one. Not reimbursing those affected would cause a problem of user retention as it could create frustration and friction amongst the community, some might be core users. On the other hand, reimbursing would weaken the DAO Treasury and this could take years to recover, which would have an impact on the long term.

Thank you for considering my application!