Name: Pedro Breuer

Address or ENS: 0xeB13FD078AB234737cC8621Be00F007cA35bB3c3 / pedrobreuer.eth

Tally Profile URL: https://www.tally.xyz/gov/arbitrum/delegate/pedrobreuer.eth

What area are you most interested in contributing to? 

• DeFi development on Arbitrum
• Improving Governance participation

Please share your stance on overall goals for the DAO:

After a little more than a year of existence, the Arbitrum DAO is at the perfect moment to transition into an organization with a sustainable business model that will enable its growth and long-term success. It is crucial to learn from the results of the past year regarding incentive programs and resource utilization to improve spending efficiency. Allocating time and resources to proper treasury management is essential, allowing us to implement a spending plan that aligns with our long-term vision.

Arbitrum DAO should aim to be the premier Layer 2 solution. Its technology should be licensed and utilized by as many chains as possible. We must strive to build an interoperable ecosystem around Orbit that attracts users and builders through the ecosystem's inherent value.

Sample Voting Issue 1:

1. I would vote against.

2. Although they can work together, the allocation committee and the oversight committee shouldn't be composed of the same people.

"Large votes from university clubs supported the proposal since they would get a seat on the allocation committee."

This may or may not be an issue depending on the perspective, and it is the conflict of interest in voting. Currently, the DAO does not have a definition of conflict of interest to excuse oneself from participating in a vote. On the other hand, I do not believe that having voting power should be a reason to abstain from voting for oneself if one is convinced that the vote is in the best interest of the DAO. Best way to go is full disclosure of COI.

3. Centralization of power is not the same as assigning tasks for efficient execution. As long as there are checks and balances mechanisms, and this centralization ultimately depends on another decentralized power, I am in favor, because otherwise it is very difficult to execute things efficiently.

Sample Voting Issue 2:

I think that it will depend on the circunstances. I believe the DAO should look out for the interests of the users. If there is a defect in Arbitrum's technology and the DAO can absorb the cost of compensating users who suffered losses, it should proceed in that direction. If it is not economically viable, it should be able to guarantee some form of future compensation. The DAO is not an isolated entity from the chain and its ecosystem; its revenue depends on the activity of the chain. Therefore, user trust should be a priority.

Languages I speak and write:

Spanish & English

Disclosure of Conflict(s) of Interest:

I have non conflict of interests at all. In the event of a conflict of interest, it will be disclosed in a timely and appropriate manner.