This DAO is archived. Data may be stale and governance actions are disabled. Want to reactivate this DAO? Contact support.
Arbitrum Delegation Statement
Name: ruslan.klinkov
Wallet Address or ENS: suckmydiscoteque.eth
Tally Profile URL: Tally | ruslanklinkov.eth
What area are you most interested in contributing to? choose up tot wo tags:
- Public Goods funding
- DeFi development on Arbitrum
- Improving Governance participation
- Supporting Infrastructure
- Tooling, Improving protocol decentralization
Please share your stance on overall goals for the DAO:
Liquidity is the blood of the ecosystem. No liquidity means the blockchain is dead and no one needs it. We don’t have to be aggressive in extracting liquidity. We need to create good conditions for liquidity to be added naturally and stored securely. The main task of the DAO is to form the principles of fair management of the protocol. Decisions made must be in the interest of Arbitrum’s development, not of individuals.
Sample Voting Issue 1:
- Against
- I would suggest a few conditions to choose from. Strengths and weaknesses should have been added to the proposal. In this case, I will not write it in detail, because the proposal has already been accepted and it has no practical value
- It is important to listen to influential members of the community to make important decisions. There must be enough of them to respect the principles of decentralization, because DAOs are not always decentralized. A compromise can also be options when the proposal is implemented in stages, that is, gradually. At each stage, you can monitor the effectiveness and make changes if necessary.
Sample Voting Issue 2:
- Split Reimbursement
Users should feel safe entrusting their funds to protocols. That’s why reimbursement is the right policy. Users are not to blame if protocol management missed something and there were exploits/backdoors.
However, reimbursing everyone will set a precedent: projects can be scammers and do their own hacks of their protocols. That’s why I think that most protocols should insure themselves, to be able to cover costs, at least partially.
Also, there should be strict controls and security checks on smart contracts. Without an audit, the protocol should not be allowed to operate.
Languages I speak and write:
speak and write English fluently
I have no conflict of interest. I want to be important and necessary for the development of Arbitrum
This information was sourced from https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/31/184
| Proposal | Votes for | Votes against | Voted? |
|---|---|---|---|
Executed Jun 8th, 2026 | 206.39M | 8.67M | No vote |
Executed May 11th, 2026 | 193.12M | 4.05K | No vote |
Executed Apr 20th, 2026 | 193.92M | 266.93K | For |
Executed Feb 23rd, 2026 | 247.89M | 362.6K | No vote |
Executed Dec 1st, 2025 | 263.67M | 16K | Abstain |
| Proposal | Ballot |
|---|---|
No vote | |
No vote | |
For | |
No vote | |
Abstain |
