This DAO is archived. Data may be stale and governance actions are disabled. Want to reactivate this DAO? Contact support.
Name (organization or individual)
- Bruno Škvorc
Wallet Address or ENS
- bruno.eth
Tally Profile URL (create a profile here )
What area are you most interested in contributing to?
- NFT development on Arbitrum
- Improving Governance participation
Please share your stance on overall goals for the DAO:
- I do not care about liquidity mining. Bribing people to use X means X is useless. We aggressively build stuff that people NEED instead.
Sample Voting Issue 1:
- Against
- No amendments, just cancel it altogether.
- The solution is reputational avatars, which solves most if not all DAO participation and token-weight voting problems.
Sample Voting Issue 2:
It depends entirely where the reimbursement would come from. If this were a case of introducing a self-executable on-chain transfer block on the hacked amount and reminting into the damaged parties’ accounts, I would vote yes. If the tokenholders and other network participants were to pay for this, no. Socializing losses across a large number of people is not acceptable when it is clear that very small circles of people are responsible for both insecure code and stealing the money.
Languages I speak and write:
- English, Croatian, Interslavic, German.
Disclosure of Conflict(s) of Interest:
- no conflicts of interest
This information was sourced from https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/31/10
| Proposal | Votes for | Votes against | Voted? |
|---|---|---|---|
Executed Jun 8th, 2026 | 206.39M | 8.67M | No vote |
Executed May 11th, 2026 | 193.12M | 4.05K | No vote |
Executed Apr 20th, 2026 | 193.92M | 266.93K | No vote |
Executed Feb 23rd, 2026 | 247.89M | 362.6K | No vote |
Executed Dec 1st, 2025 | 263.67M | 16K | No vote |
| Proposal | Ballot |
|---|---|
No vote | |
No vote | |
No vote | |
No vote | |
No vote |
