Name : Shojaie

ENS : Shojaie.eth

Tally Profile: Tally | Shojaie

Areas of interest:

• Public Goods funding
• DeFi & NFT development on Arbitrum

My stance on overall goals for the DAO:

The goal of the DAO in liquidity mining should be to create a sustainable and efficient network that benefits all users. This means that the rewards program should be designed in a way that encourages long-term participation and doesn’t create a “pump and dump” scenario where users only provide liquidity for the rewards and then withdraw their funds once the rewards dry up.

The DAO should also prioritize fairness in its rewards distribution. This means that the rewards should be distributed based on each user’s contribution to the network rather than simply the amount of liquidity they provide.

Overall, the perfect network like Arbitrum should aim to strike a balance between incentivizing users to provide liquidity and creating a sustainable and fair rewards program that benefits all participants. The DAO should prioritize the long-term health of the network over short-term gains and work towards creating a decentralized and efficient system that can compete with traditional financial systems.

Sample Voting Issue 1:

As a delegate, I would oppose the current Uniswap proposal. Although I recognize that bounties can be a valuable tool for drawing new users to the platform, I am concerned about the extent of power and control that the proposal would give to Flipside crypto. In my opinion, this arrangement could pave the way for the centralization of authority and could place Flipside at an unfair advantage.

Sample Voting Issue 2:

As a delegate, I am of the opinion that the reimbursement of victims of the Rari hack is a complex matter that requires careful consideration and a nuanced approach. Although I sympathize with those impacted by the hack, it’s important to carefully evaluate the potential pros and cons of reimbursing them.

In my perspective, the decision to reimburse parties affected by a hack should consider several factors, such as the severity of the attack, its impact on the community, and the feasibility of reimbursement. Depending on the specific case, full reimbursement may be justified if the attack was particularly harmful or a result of a fundamental issue within the platform. However, in other instances, it may not be practical or suitable to provide full reimbursement.

Overall, I believe that each reimbursement decision should be made on a case-by-case basis, taking into account the unique circumstances of the situation. As a delegate, my goal would be to ensure that the interests of all community members are represented impartially and that decisions are made transparently and responsibly.

Languages I speak and write:

German, English, Persian

LFG ARBITRUM