Name: David Mihal

Wallet Address or ENS: mihal.eth

Tally Profile URL: Tally | mihal.eth

What area are you most interested in contributing to? choose up to two tags:

• Supporting Infrastructure
• Tooling, Improving protocol decentralization

Please share your stance on overall goals for the DAO:

I believe liquidity mining is unnecessary on a chain like Arbitrum that already has a strong DeFi ecosystem.

I believe any token distributions should be used to incentivize the development of L3s on top of Arbitrum, as well as licensing of the Arbitrum technology (which will drive value to the Arbitrum DAO).

Sample Voting Issue 1:
Issue Overview

Prompts to Answer:

1. How would you vote?
   For

2. What amendments would you make to the proposal if any?

No ammendments.

3. How would you approach the tradeoff between centralization of authority and the ability to get things done?

To strike a balance between centralization of authority and the ability to get things done, organizations should delegate tasks, establish clear roles and responsibilities, and create efficient decision-making processes. This approach can maximize efficiency while maintaining decentralization principles. By continuously evaluating and adapting the organizational structure and processes, organizations can leverage the benefits of decentralization, such as increased trust, collaboration, and innovation, while maintaining overall competence and integrity.

Sample Voting Issue 2:

Outside the flipping of the vote, how would you choose to handle this situation?
i.e should parties be reimbursed for an exploit or not? (Please choose one of the below options and then elaborate upon your reasoning)

I would have voted for full reimbursement, as I believe the DAO has an obligation users to do whatever is possible to prevent user loss of funds.

Languages I speak and write:

English y Espanol

Disclosure of Conflict(s) of Interest:

None