Name (organization or individual) ultra

Wallet Address or ENS 0x539629494be6b004d33d290E6243806750A3A2f4

Tally Profile Tally | ultra
What area are you most interested in contributing to? choose up tot wo tags:

• Public Goods funding
• DeFi development on Arbitrum
• Improving Governance participation
• Supporting Infrastructure
• Tooling, Improving protocol decentralization

Please share your stance on overall goals for the DAO:
The DAO should focus on selectively directing incentives to areas which are currently lacking or missing on Arbitrum chain as well as incubating new exciting protocols. Arbitrum should strive to create the most diverse, unique and useful ecosystem and incentives are a great tool for this. Arbitrum projects so far have been extremely collaborative with minimal pvp behaviour; we must try to protect this kind of environment.

Sample Voting Issue 1:

1. How would you vote?
   Against
2. What amendments would you make to the proposal if any?
   No amendments
3. How would you approach the tradeoff between centralization of authority and the ability to get things done?
   Introduction of more layers of delegation and committees can help decentralise voting while maintaining the interests of the DAO. Recurring elections and minimum activity requirements would also ensure delegates maintain their duties.

Sample Voting Issue 2:

1. Outside the flipping of the vote, how would you choose to handle this situation?
   Full Reimbursement
   I was personally affected by the FEI hack and understand how affected people felt. It is important for delegates to vote for whatever the majority of people want and uphold their interests, so a full reimbursement is the right choice.

Languages I speak and write: English

Disclosure of Conflict(s) of Interest:
For the past 1+ year I have spent most of my time launching and scaling Jones DAO on the engineering side and have a number of advisory and seed relationships in various protocols that can be discussed privately.