Name (organization or individual) Ceazor’s Snack Sandwich

Wallet Address or ENS ceazor.eth

Tally Profile URL Tally | ceazor.eth

What area are you most interested in contributing to? choose up tot wo tags:

• DeFi development on Arbitrum
• Improving Governance participation
• IRL Arbitrum community gatherings

Please share your stance on overall goals for the DAO:
I believe strongly in the education factor of adoption. Defi is the bloodline of any chain and what creates the opportunity for niche uses to thrive and grow.

Sample Voting Issue 1:
Issue Overview

• Uniswap planned to use Flipside to attract new users to Uniswap through bounties. Although the program outline and funding was fine, the proposal was contentious because it gave Flipside crypto too much control over allocating UNI to bounties and oversight of the entire program.
• For instance, Flipside had 3/7 seats on the allocation committee and 1/3 seats on the Oversight committee. There was also concern since none of the other analytics service providers were involved in the proposal.
• This proposal flew under the radar but at the 11th hour got very heated. Large votes from university clubs supported the proposal since they would get a seat on the allocation committee. However, Dune and Leshner spoke up about the issue because of the centralization of power and favor of one service provider.

Prompts to Answer:

1. How would you vote?

Against

2. What amendments would you make to the proposal if any?

Flipside would need to be sufficiently decentralized and have a proper DAO framework to be even considered for this level of power over such a large project.

3. How would you approach the tradeoff between centralization of authority and the ability to get things done?

There are great examples of both fully decentralized DAOs, and their ability to filter and fasttrack development, but there are also great examples of centralized teams that get things done and are able to have the agility to develop fast.

In the growth phase of a project agility is important to sustain growth, but as the gov tokens disperse, they should aim to hand the keys over to a DAO.

putting the tag DAO on the name doesn’t cover this. The keys need to be burnt, or given to the DAO.

At the protocol level, “chain” it is much more important that as the project level.

Sample Voting Issue 2:
Issue Overview:
Overview Link 1
Overview Link 2

FEI RARI Hack Reimbursement: In April 2022 Rari was hacked for 80M, a vote was passed to reimburse those affected. Then in May 2022 another vote to refund the Rari hacked was brought forward this time it was not passed.

Prompts to Answer:

Outside the flipping of the vote, how would you choose to handle this situation?
i.e should parties be reimbursed for an exploit or not? (Please choose one of the below options and then elaborate upon your reasoning)

1. Full Reimbursement

If the initial vote had passed, and there were no issue with the voting, ie quorum was achieved, there was no votign power exploits, the 1st vote should have been honored.

Languages I speak and write: English

Disclosure of Conflict(s) of Interest:
Diversity of opinions is critical to making progress and determining the future direction of the
Arbitrum ecosystem. We recognize and celebrate the fact that delegates will have diverse views and we both encourage and anticipate good-faith debates in the governance process. That being said, it’s critical that all featured delegates are operating with Arbitrum’s best interest in mind, so please affirm that you don’t have any conflicts of interest that would prevent you from using your best judgement to operate in the best interests of advancing the Arbitrum ecosystem.