Name: JPCryptoN ( individual)
ENS: jpcrypton.eth
Tally: Tally | jpcrypton.eth

Areas of interest:

• DeFi development on Arbitrum
• Improving Governance participation

Sample Voting Issue 1:
Issue Overview

• Uniswap planned to use Flipside to attract new users to Uniswap through bounties. Although the program outline and funding was fine, the proposal was contentious because it gave Flipside crypto too much control over allocating UNI to bounties and oversight of the entire program.
• For instance, Flipside had 3/7 seats on the allocation committee and 1/3 seats on the Oversight committee. There was also concern since none of the other analytics service providers were involved in the proposal.
• This proposal flew under the radar but at the 11th hour got very heated. Large votes from university clubs supported the proposal since they would get a seat on the allocation committee. However, Dune and Leshner spoke up about the issue because of the centralization of power and favor of one service provider.

Prompts to Answer:

1. How would you vote?
   For
   Against
2. What amendments would you make to the proposal if any?
3. How would you approach the tradeoff between centralization of authority and the ability to get things done?

Languages I speak and write
English