This DAO is archived. Data may be stale and governance actions are disabled. Want to reactivate this DAO? Contact support.
Delegating 3.84K ARB to:
Trying my best to contribute to an open and immutable foundation of money & finance.
0xAfD5...A0A0
Arbitrum Delegation Statement
Name (organization or individual): McFly
Wallet Address or ENS: 0xmcfly.eth
Tally Profile URL: https://www.tally.xyz/profile/0xafd5f60aa8eb4f488eaa0ef98c1c5b0645d9a0a0
What area are you most interested in contributing to?:
- Improving Governance participation
- Tooling, Improving protocol decentralization
Please share your stance on overall goals for the DAO:
My stance on the overall goals for the Arbitrum DAO:
- Decentralization: Empower community decision-making.
- Scalability: Enhance Arbitrum protocols for efficient transactions.
- Security: Ensure trust through distributed governance.
- Alignment: Foster collaboration between Arbitrum and Ethereum.
- Open source: Promote transparency and innovation.
- Staking: Launch $ARB staking swiftly.
- Innovation: Encourage new applications and services.
- Transparency: Implement accountable governance systems.
Sample Voting Issue 1:
- How would you vote?
Against - What amendments would you make to the proposal if any?
- Reduce the overall grant.
- Ask the Uniswap community a list of potential candidates for this kind of grants.
- Impose a stricter framework regarding how the funds could be spent by the grantee.
- Vest the grant over 12mo and give an upfront funding representing 30% of the total grant.
- How would you approach the tradeoff between centralization of authority and the ability to get things done?
Initially, a certain level of centralization might be required for swift decision-making and promoting development. However, as the platform evolves and attracts a robust community, moving towards a more decentralized governance structure becomes crucial. This gradual shift towards decentralization grants the community a say in the decision-making process and guarantees a variety of viewpoints. Achieving this balance ensures efficient decision-making while upholding the foundational principles of decentralization, resulting in a resilient and adaptable platform.
Sample Voting Issue 2:
No Reimbursement. As we saw with the ending of the Rari project, a DAO can’t be an insurance fund and at the same time the project’s treasury. Liquidity is a huge obstacle to accomplish that and every user was clearly warned that there might be high risk to use their platform. Everyone should take their responsibilities and don’t assume someone will save them if something breaks.
Languages I speak and write: English, French, Portuguese, Italian.
Disclosure of Conflict(s) of Interest: N.A
This information was sourced from https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/31/441
| Proposal | Votes for | Votes against | Voted? |
|---|---|---|---|
Executed Jun 8th, 2026 | 206.39M | 8.67M | No vote |
Executed May 11th, 2026 | 193.12M | 4.05K | No vote |
Executed Apr 20th, 2026 | 193.92M | 266.93K | No vote |
Executed Feb 23rd, 2026 | 247.89M | 362.6K | No vote |
Executed Dec 1st, 2025 | 263.67M | 16K | No vote |
| Proposal | Ballot |
|---|---|
No vote | |
No vote | |
No vote | |
No vote | |
No vote |
