Proposals

/

Proposal

Pending queue

SIP1.6: Offboard low usage Vaults across HyperEVM, Sonic and Arbitrum


User profile image

by

by

chrisb.eth

chrisb.eth

ID 575670...3231

ID 575670...3231

Proposed on: May 8th, 2026

Proposed on: May 8th, 2026

Votes

Actions

Type

Address

Details

Custom

sendProposalToTargetChain(..)

Custom

Account

0x4cEe...3274

Method

sendProposalToTargetChain(..)

Custom

0x4cEe...3274

sendProposalToTargetChain(..)

Custom

Account

0x4cEe...3274

Method

sendProposalToTargetChain(..)

Proposal

1. Overview:

As per the RFC; https://forum.summer.fi/t/rfc-offboard-low-usage-vaults-across-hyperevm-sonic-and-arbitrum/818, this SIP proposes to offboard all Fleets/Vaults from HyperEVM, Sonic and Arbitrum through setting deposit caps and fee's to 0.


2. Motivation:

Since hitting 200M TVL, the Summer Protocol has struggled with issues within DeFi and users losing trust leaving their capital, as well as the low yields on offer due to the reducing demand of DeFi and leverage in general as the market has struggled since late summer last year (2025).

As such, we now have a number of vaults with less than $100k TVL, and with less than 25 active users with > $100 deposited. For this reason, it is suggested to offboard these vaults.

Also, with the current SUMR rewards ending on the 10th May, this feels a good time to address this concern, and focus SUMR rewards on those Vaults which drive the most TVL and activity.

At present, the vaults in question would only represent 242,000 USD of TVL - less than 1% of the protocols TVL.

Should DeFi and the markets start to recover, and activity/demand start to appear, these vaults can easily be reactivated simply by increasing the deposit caps and enabling new or existing markets and the automated rebalancer keepers.


3. Specification:

The following will set all vaults across HyperEVM, Arbitrum and Sonic deposit caps and fee's to 0.

FleetUSDC
NetworkHyperEVM
Contract Address0x252e5aa42c1804b85b2ce6712cd418a0561232ba
Deposit Cap0
Fee0
FleetUSDT
NetworkHyperEVM
Contract Address0x2cc190fb654141dfbeac4c0f718f4d511674d346
Deposit Cap0
Fee0
FleetUSDC
NetworkArbitrum
Contract Address0x71d77c39db0eb5d086611a2e950198e3077cf58a
Deposit Cap0
Fee0
FleetUSDT
NetworkArbitrum
Contract Address0x98c49e13bf99d7cad8069faa2a370933ec9ecf17
Deposit Cap0
Fee0
FleetUSDC
NetworkSonic
Contract Address0x507a2d9e87dbd3076e65992049c41270b47964f8
Deposit Cap0
Fee0

4. Risk Assessment:

No risks expected


5. Voting:

A YES vote will execute Fleet/Vault updates across Arbtirum and Sonic, setting the deposit caps and Fee's to 0 across all vaults on those networks. A NO vote will not make any changes.

HyperEVM will not be executed in this vote as the correct governance peers are not yet enabled.

Votes
Status