This DAO is archived. Data may be stale and governance actions are disabled. Want to reactivate this DAO? Contact support.
Name (organization or individual)
Ali Asadi
Wallet Address or ENS
ali3a.eth
Tally Profile URL (create a profile here 1)

ali3a.eth's DAO Profile
DAO memberships, votes and proposal
What area are you most interested in contributing to?
NFT development on Arbitrum
Improving Governance participation
Trading on Arbitrum
Building Web3
Please share your stance on overall goals for the DAO:
Since im a builder i keep looking for future and dont care about market situation now… i keep building and when time comes i will get the Reward
Sample Voting Issue 1:
Against
No amendments, just cancel it altogether.
The solution is reputational avatars, which solves most if not all DAO participation and token-weight voting problems.
Sample Voting Issue 2:
It depends entirely where the reimbursement would come from. If this were a case of introducing a self-executable on-chain transfer block on the hacked amount and reminting into the damaged parties’ accounts, I would vote yes. If the tokenholders and other network participants were to pay for this, no. Socializing losses across a large number of people is not acceptable when it is clear that very small circles of people are responsible for both insecure code and stealing the money.
Languages I speak and write:
English-Persian & Chineese
Disclosure of Conflict(s) of Interest:
no conflicts of interest
This information was sourced from https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/31/1080
| Proposal | Votes for | Votes against | Voted? |
|---|---|---|---|
Executed Jun 8th, 2026 | 206.39M | 8.67M | No vote |
Executed May 11th, 2026 | 193.12M | 4.05K | No vote |
Executed Apr 20th, 2026 | 193.92M | 266.93K | No vote |
Executed Feb 23rd, 2026 | 247.89M | 362.6K | No vote |
Executed Dec 1st, 2025 | 263.67M | 16K | No vote |
| Proposal | Ballot |
|---|---|
No vote | |
No vote | |
No vote | |
No vote | |
No vote |
