Wallet Address or ENS

• 0x6f5671007B15a49afF5DD830183Cd02D49E8Be04

Tally Profile URL ( here )

What area are you most interested in contributing to?

• Improving Governance participation
  *Supporting Infrastructure

Please share your stance on overall goals for the DAO:

• Liquidity Mining attract more users, but it only benefits the early investors. As more users comes in, it reduces the amount of yield for late investors while the early miners got a ton of rewards to dump into the new users. Most of the time, the people who controls the large number of tokens, dictates the outcome of any proposal. May it be good or bad for the over all health of the ecosystem.

Sample Voting Issue 1:

1. Against
2. No amendments, it should have been rejected in the first place.
3. Have a senate voted people, who have identities known to all users. They can be the last people to double check that the governance vote is properly executed. And a vote should be a token-weight voting.

Sample Voting Issue 2:
For reimbursements, it should be stated if where the funds would come from. If the token holders or participants were to pay for this, then its a NO for me. But If this is a self-executable on-chain transfer block on the hacked amount and reimbursing into the damaged parties’ accounts, my vote is YES.

Another option is to have a partial reimbursement to all parties affected, atleast everyone takes a haircut, as we all know that investing in crypto is risky. And hacks are part of it.

Languages I speak and write:

• English, Filipino

Disclosure of Conflict(s) of Interest:

• no conflicts of interest