This DAO is paused. Data may be stale and governance actions are temporarily disabled. Want to reactivate this DAO? Contact support.
L2BEAT is an independent, public goods company who acts as an impartial watchdog for the Ethereum Layer2 ecosystem. Our mission is to provide comprehensive and unbiased analysis and comparative evaluations of Layer 2 solutions . We are committed to the verification and fact-checking of the claims made by each project, with a special focus on the security aspects. What sets L2BEAT apart is our unwavering commitment to delivering accurate and reliable information.
0x1B68...eeaD
X
Optimism Delegation Statement
Name : Kris Kaczor (L2BEAT)
Address or ENS: 0x1B686eE8E31c5959D9F5BBd8122a58682788eeaD
Discord username : krzkaczor#6240
Verification (Tally profile or tweet): https://twitter.com/krzKaczor/status/1526294586510950402
I have read and understood the Delegate Commitment Process: YES
I understand that becoming a delegate is a significant commitment: YES
My reasons for wanting to be a delegate:
As a L2Beat.com co-founder, Iβve spent a lot of time researching and educating people about different ways that Ethereum can scale. I am a technical person not afraid to dive deep into tech. Bringing transparency and ensuring well being of rollup users was always a top priority for me. I hope that by becoming a delegate I can help to steer the development of Optimism in the right direction and fulfill these goals.
My view on the Optimistic Vision :
Public Goods are essential for any thriving community (virtual or not). A systemic solution to the public goods funding problem will make Optimism the best rollup to use.
The previous year, I had a pleasure to participate in the first Retroactive Public Goods Founding round done by Optimism. This gave me an opportunity to help many critical tools that lack any business model. I believe that baking public goods funding as a core principle of a rollup will be a game-changer for the quality of the whole ecosystem.
My view on the first three articles of the Working Constitution:
- As a MakerDAO governance participant I know firsthand that itβs impossible to design a perfect system on the first try. We will have to experiment and iterate for years before we get the governance model right.
- Typical token governance with the airdrops model is broken (for everyone except yield farmers). Providing voting power to actual users of the domain seems like a good alignment and itβs quite innovative on its own.
- It seems like a reasonable way to bootstrap the whole thing.
My Web3 interests:
DeFi, Developer tools, Infrastructure, Governance, Security
Languages I speak and write:
Polish, English
My skills and areas of expertise: writing and reading smart contracts, dev tooling, researching ethereum scalability solutions, trying to break rollups
My favorite Web3 projects:
MakerDAO, L2BEAT, DethCrypto 
This information was sourced from https://gov.optimism.io/t/235/47
| Proposal | Votes for | Votes against | Voted? |
|---|---|---|---|
Active Oct 16th, 2026 | 0 | 8.34K | No vote |
Pending execution Sep 10th, 2026 | 2.89K | 71.7K | No vote |
Pending execution Sep 2nd, 2026 | 3.98K | 24.03K | No vote |
Pending execution Sep 2nd, 2026 | 1.91K | 23.56K | No vote |
Pending execution Aug 21st, 2026 | 0 | 96.34K | No vote |
| Proposal | Ballot |
|---|---|
No vote | |
Pending execution | No vote |
Pending execution | No vote |
Pending execution | No vote |
Pending execution | No vote |
